Untitled Document

Research Impact Statements
2000



Cotton, Water, Nitrogen and IPM in Precision Agriculture


Principal Investigator: Robert J. Lascano
Texas Agricultural Experiment Station, Lubbock

Cooperators:
Lubbock: Hong Li, Jill Booker, Kevin Bronson, Wayne Keeling
Beaumont: Ted Wilson


The main purpose of this research is to establish baseline information on the suitability and applicability of precision agriculture practices for cotton production.

Our initial emphasis has been on quantifying parameters that contribute to lint yield variability across large fields.

We selected to do most of our field studies in Lamesa using the Ag-Cares facility as a way of promoting our results and having immediate applicability to cotton producers in this area.

In our initial soil sampling, on a ¼ acre grid and soil depth, across the field it was found that nitrate-N has accumulated and in some places exceeds 250 lbs N/A to a depth of 4 ft. This accumulation is the result of applying 100 lbs/A of N fertilizer every year for the last 5 years.

Further, contributing to this accumulation has been the lack of significant rains resulting in a N buildup in the soil profile.

The soil survey clearly established that it is not sufficient to just sample the surface 6" and that deeper depths must also be considered and tested for N content.

 


Classical statistics analysis and small plot work are not appropriate to evaluate site-specific management schemes.


 

Instead, work must be done at the landscape level and using its variability as the source of variation for the variable in question.

Further, spatial statistical tools such as autocorrelation, crosscorrelation and state-space analysis are appropriate to assess parameters that contribute to crop yield variability.

 

 


Using state-space analysis we demonstrated that in the AgCares farm three variables can predict cotton lint yield variability:

  • water
  • nitrogen (N)
  • slope

These variables are not randomly distributed and have spatial structure and may be related up to distances of 120 ft.

Water and nutrients accumulate in lower elevations and as a result these sites have higher lint yields.

These equations can be used to maximize N and water application across the field and evaluate economic returns. We can now explain, with a large level of confidence, where in the field and how cotton lint yield varies. These results can also be used for the identification of management zones within a field.

Remote sensing provides tools to rapidly evaluate biomass and lint yield in large areas.

All cotton spectral parameters were affected by irrigation and interaction between irrigation and N input. Spectral reflectance, NDVI, plant water and N use, and lint yield were associated with elevation and soil texture.

Results from our insect work set the basis to establish site-specific pest thresholds.

The Scout Master for cotton data management program has proven to be a valuable tool for cotton Extension Agents. Scout Master for cotton has the potential to improve the cost-effectiveness of cotton production in Texas.

Quantifying the effects of irrigation and N fertilizer levels on insect pest densities and insect damage to cotton, and specifically how they affect heliothis damage to cotton is valuable baseline data for the development of site-specific information for insect pest of cotton.

We continue to integrate our results using physiologically based cotton models. An anticipated component of our site-specific cotton research will be directed towards developing decision support systems for cotton management using variable rates and based on economic returns.